If you work with influencers – be they traditional media, analysts, bloggers or something in between – you need to know what makes them tick. In my “Influencing the Influencers” presentation, I somewhat flippantly called this stalking (of which I meant the non-creepy, from afar kind). This thread between the BBC’s Dave Lee & online journalism lecturer Andy Dickinson is but one example of how just doing something simple, like monitoring Twitter, can make you smarter about the influencers you work with…and, in turn, make their lives a bit easier. What looks like a fun exchange about headline character count is,…
The Financial Times’ John Gapper reports tonight on advance wording in a speech that Microsoft associate general counsel Tom Rubin will give tomorrow. In his remarks, Rubin will take a shot at what Microsoft views as Google’s/YouTube’s
disregard for copyright rules.
I’m not a lawyer (in fact, in most people’s minds I’m only half a rung up the ladder as a PR person), so I won’t pretend to comment on whether Rubin has a legal leg to stand on. I do, however, believe that Rubin and others (RIAA/MPAA and proprietary software vendors are you listening?) are stuck in neutral while their customers and competitors move forward like a Porsche on a straightaway.
Microsoft and the old media guard are clinging to a copyright fight that is stuck in yesterday’s business models. They’ve refused to adapt to the tenets of business: listening to the market and their customers. Instead of fighting for history, they should be working with their customers — and, more importantly, their customers’ customers — to map out a better future.

